Categories
literature

Tomorrow and tomorrow and tomorrow

The actress and playwright Anna Deveare Smith has made her name writing and performing in plays such as Twilight: Los Angeles, 1992 and, most recently, Notes from the Field, which examines the school-to-prison pipeline. To create these plays, she interviews scores of people whose expertise and experience have to do with the subject of her investigation, and then she embodies these characters on stage. For example, for Twilight, she interviewed hundreds of people (public officials, residents, etc.) about the riots that happened in the aftermath of the trial of the LA police officers caught on video beating Rodney King. She then constructed the play with monologues taken from the interview transcripts, and she plays every person herself.

Anna Deveare Smith

How did this remarkable woman train to be an actress, to inhabit such varied characters? Here’s what she has to say about what reading (and speaking) Shakespeare taught her about character.

      I was afraid of many things. I was afraid of heights… But nothing matched my fear of Shakespeare. …Our Shakespeare teacher was like a racehorse waiting at the gate… She told us on the first day about trochees. Most of us had heard of iambic pentameter: BuhDUH buh DUHbuh DUHbuhDUHbuh DUH. …

      “Now, a trochee,” she explained, “happens when the iamb goes upside down. So that instead of Buh DUH, you get BUH duh.”

      She maintained that if you got a trochee in the second beat, a character was really “losing it” psychologically, and this “loss” made it possible for you to know something about the character, if you wore his or her words.

      Losing it is a good thing in that it is a defeat of an imposed rhythmic structure.

      The classic example of everything falling to pieces rhythmically as an indicator of a character’s psychological state is King Lear, who says at one point, “Never, never, never, never, never!”

      Which is all trochees.

      From this idea, I began to see Shakespeare in general as not so frightening at all. I began to perceive him as a jazz musician, who was doing jazz with the given rhythms of his time.

      Character, then, seemed to me to be an improvisation on given rhythms. The more successful you were at improvising on language, the more jazz you have, the more likely you could be found in your language…

      Our Shakespeare teacher then gave us an assignment: “Go home, take fourteen lines of Shakespeare, and say them over and over again, until something happens.”

— Anna Deveare Smith, Talk to Me: Listening between the Lines

When Macbeth hears that his wife has died, he says: “She should have died hereafter. / There would have been time for such a word.” The ten lines that follow comprise one of Shakespeare’s most famous soliloquies.

These are the lines for you to repeat aloud and try to memorize. (I know, I know — it’s bleak! And yet… well, we’ll talk. In any case, next week, for our last class, we’ll look at a poem that asks us to to look at life in another way entirely.)

Tomorrow and tomorrow and tomorrow

Creeps in this petty pace from day to day

To the last syllable of recorded time,

And all our yesterdays have lighted fools

The way to dusty death. Out, out, brief candle!

Life’s but a walking shadow, a poor player

That struts and frets his hour upon the stage

And then is heard no more. It is a tale

Told by an idiot, full of sound and fury,

Signifying nothing.

Macbeth, Act V, Scene 5, lines 22–31
Categories
art history

Workers Work, in American Art

Today we’re going to look at two paintings of people who work: one of them taking a break, and the other of women at work.

And each of them is related to art we saw in earlier classes in ways you might find it interesting to think about.

The first painting is from 1882, made in Philadelphia, and it’s from a time when Pennsylvania was the center of America’s industrial might, with giant iron mills fed by the state’s coal mines. This kind of work was for men only, and we see only men in Thomas Anschutz’s Ironworkers’ Noontime.

Anschutz_Thomas_P_The_Ironworker-s_Noontime.jpg

Thomas Anschutz, Ironworkers’ Noontime 1882
Pennsylvania was also a center of union organizing, in the factories and mines. And union organizing was violently opposed by the government and police, who massacred miners in Colorado and attacked striking workers at the Haymarket in Chicago.So think for a second–can you remember any artwork that had a line of heroic men? (Answer below; pretend this is a puzzle in the newspaper, like the Jumble.)

Here’s your question: 

  • What is the artist telling us about these workers, and how is he telling us that?

Here’s our second painting: The Ironers, by Jacob Lawrence, who was an important African American painter and part of the Harlem Renaissance movement, an important time for Black culture.

ironers-1.jpg

This painting shows three African-American women ironing. Look how big the irons are. Can you feel how heavy this work is? Look at their postures. The painting is from the 1940s, during what is called the Great Migration, when many Black citizens fled the South to escape Jim Crow and racism.

This painting is abstract. Have we seen any other abstract paintings of women? What are they? (Answer below, like Word Scramble.)

So, let’s think about the same question: 

  • What is the artist telling us about these workers, and how is he telling us that?

And maybe you could think about how this painting is different from the Picasso paintings we saw? (Oops, the answer slipped out!) 

Okay, here’s the answers to the Jumble. (Sorry I can’t figure out how to turn them upside down):

  • 1. Parthenon, Ionic Frieze: Panathenaic Procession, 447-432 BCE
  • 2. Picasso, Ma Jolie (1911-12)and Picasso, Girl before a Mirror (Marie-Thérèse Walter) (1932)

Be well, be safe, I hope you like these paintings! I miss seeing you and want to hear from you. Please email me the answers to these questions.

Chris

 

Categories
art history

Paintings from Holland! Windmills! Dikes! Wooden Shoes!

Dear Art History Students,

Thanks so much to everybody who has written for the course. I’ve enjoyed reading what you wrote and I look forward to hearing from you every week. I hope that you looked at the Rembrandt article in the Reader. I know it’s long and it seems complex, but really the main points are simple. Aristotle Contemplating the Bust of Homer is an amazing painting, and you can see it when this is all over in the Metropolitan Museum of Art in New York.

This week I’m going to ask you to respond to two paintings, both are in the Metropolitan Museum of Art, and I’m going to give you the links to the Met’s website for the paintings. Right now, open up your reader to the handouts on Bosch and Brueghel and Rembrandt.

The painting by Pieter Bruegel is a painting of COMMON PEOPLE! How different is that from most of the paintings we’ve seen !?! Both of our painters this week are from THE NETHERLANDS — you know, Holland, windmills, dikes to keep the sea out, wooden shoes, down to earth, practical, business-minded people
And with Rembrandt we’re looking at a NEW STYLE — the Baroque. We saw a Rembrandt in our first class, The Blinding of Sampson. Baroque art has drama from the lighting, and sometimes from violence. (If you read Nochlin’s article on women artists, you might remember Artemisia Gentilleschi did a painting of Judith Slaying Holofernes, which is also a Baroque painting.)
Ok, your eyes are glazing over now, right? Let’s get onto the paintings (sorry, no violence).

Harvest, 1565, oil on panel (commissioned by a rich merchant Nicolaes Jonghelinck) https://www.metmuseum.org/art/collection/search/435809 
Here are some questions:

  • 1. What did the artist and the person who paid for this painting think about common people?
  • 2. How many different ways is hay shown in the painting? Why?
  • 3. The right and left sides of the paintings have very different compositions; does that make it more interesting?
734px-Rembrandt_-_Aristotle_with_a_Bust_of_Homer_-_Google_Art_Project.jpg

Rembrandt, Aristotle with a Bust of Homer, 1653
https://www.metmuseum.org/en/art/collection/search/437394

  • 1. Who are the three characters who appear in the painting? 
  • 2.What meaning does the medium in which each character is depicted mean?
  • 3. How does the chiaroscuro (deep contrast of light and dark) impact the COMPOSITION of the painting?

I want to hear from you — so if you want to do something creative instead of answering the questions, do that:

  • Write a story about the painting
  • Make a drawing(s) about the painting that expresses an idea
  • Take a picture of something that reminds you of the painting, and explain why.

Be Safe, Be Well!

Chris
Email, call, or text me with QUESTIONS!

Categories
art history

Impressionist Flowers for Spring

Dear Students,
Today’s class is about Impressionism — light flower fashion! Everybody likes Monet’s flowers — think about how many calendars and tote bags are covered with them.
We also look at Picasso and Cubism today. We looked at his painting, Girl in a Mirror (it’s here if you want to see it again (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Girl_before_a_Mirror)
And I have two questions for you:

  • 1. How is Monet’s painting Waterlilies different from the paintings we’ve looked at before?
  • 2. Why did Picasso and the Cubists want to show things from more than one viewpoint at once?

1. IMPRESSIONISM and MONET

So here is a painting by Monet, called Waterlilies (it’s in the Museum of Modern Art, NY).

It’s a painting of a waterlily pond in Monet’s garden — all you can see is the pond’s surface, the waterlilies, and reflections on the water’s surface. The Impressionists were interested in painting how we see, in painting light and color. And nature. And modern life in cities and in the countryside — enjoying cafes and music and, like here, being in gardens.
So here’s Question 1: How is this different from paintings we’ve seen before?


2. CUBISM AND PICASSO

This painting by Pablo Picasso is called Ma Jolie (My Pretty One), from 1911-1912It shows a girl playing a mandolin. The big light triangle in the lower left is her right arm bent to reach the strings. You can see the guitar’s body with the sound hole and its neck going up to the right. What looks like a hand at the lower right is panpipes. 

Imagine yourself walking around a woman playing guitar and how she and the instrument would look from different angles, and see if you can understand what Picasso is doing.

This painting is over 100 years old. Think about how TECHNOLOGY (photos and movies)  and SCIENCE (microscopes, telescopes, Einstein’s relativity) changed how people saw the world then.

So, Question 2: Why did Picasso try to paint this woman from many angles at once?

I miss seeing you all, and especially talking to you. I love your questions.

Email me your responses!

Be well be safe.Chris

Categories
art history

Great Museum Videos & Virtual Tours

Dear Students,
You can take virtual tours of museums, and there’s a really good YouTube channel called Great Museums with video tours of wonderful places like the Metropolitan Museum of Art in New York (and military and jazz and all kinds of museums!)

If you want to take a virtual tour of a museum, Google has over 2,500 of them available for virtual tours. Google partners with the museums, so their sites are different. If you like Vincent van Gogh, you can see lots of his paintings, and view a slide show on his love life (like Access Hollywood but Art). The National Gallery of Art in Washington, DC, has a good virtual fashion show. And lots of the museums have YouTube channels.

Follow this link to the Google Arts & Culture museum partners site: https://artsandculture.google.com/partner?hl=en
This is what the first page of their website looks like:

Notice that you can click on the Van Gogh Museum, the Museum of Modern Art (where Monet’s Waterlilies is), and the Metropolitan Museum of Art. The Met has an iphone app also.

Some museums have their own tours or cooler Google tours. I liked these:

The British Museum: https://britishmuseum.withgoogle.com/

The Louvre: https://www.louvre.fr/en/visites-en-ligne    The Louvre has 4 virtual tours, they’re good, one on Artists, another on Egypt… these are fun.

For video tours, and other cool videos, I recommend the Great Museums YouTube channel. The videos were done in partnership with PBS in many cases, and they are quite diverse: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCJDe3E1Wfp5YbRtjLSPW6cQ

And to go with your look into van Gogh’s love lives, if you want some blood and crime and sex in your art video, take a look at this documentary on Caravaggio, a master of chiaroscuro: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lbCtoTntfEY
Art is inspiring! You might enjoy these! 

Be well, be safe, and I hope you find these entertaining.

Chris